Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: "Punctual Equilibrium", or "evolutionary stuff"
- Subject: Re: "Punctual Equilibrium", or "evolutionary stuff"
- From: "John R. Ernst" <ernst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 01:17:46 -0500
Charles,
Let's name names. Who are these vulgar Marxists who still hold
fast to the teleological view? I am beginning to think it's becoming
a bit vulgar to condemn that which seems to be merely virtually
vulgar.
John
P.S. Soviet speeches????
Sat, 13 Jan 1996 "Charles K. MacKay" <ckmackay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>Marx, of course, never said The Revolution would come by next Tuesday.
>The closest defense of a teleological view that "...The Revolution gotta
>come sometime" is in Bertell Ollman's _Alientation: Marx's View of Man
>etc._ in which he argues that Marx had to have thought that the nature
>of the proletariat under capitalism was such that *** one *** possible,
>and indeed, likely, response, was The Revolution. A "weak" teleological
>interpretation would hold that the proletariat has this state at some
>point in history which may pass without a revolutionary response; a
>"strong" teleological view would hold that the only direction for change
>from the current state for the proletariat is a revolutionary one, and
>Marx seems to come very close to saying this in the Manifesto, which is,
>as has so often been noted on this list, propaganda. Usually the
>teleological view are found in "vulgar" Marxist tracts or official
>Soviet speeches, but it is _an_ interpreation of Marx that is tempting,
>seems to be the obvious one on a superficial reading of some texts, and
>is not _obviously_ wrong at first glance.
>
>John R. Ernst wrote:
>>
>> Charles,
>>
>> Thanks for your post, reproduced below. There is
>> only one part about which I'd like to know more.
>>
>> Who are these people who hold telelogical views
>> relative to the coming revolution (smile)? I often
>> hear the postition denounced but I have never
>> heard anyone defend it. Let me say that I, too,
>> am against it and am in search of the oppostion.
>> //snip//
>
>
>
>
> --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: "Punctual Equilibrium", or "evolutionary stuff", (continued)
- Re: "Punctual Equilibrium", or "evolutionary stuff",
Charles K. MacKay Sat 13 Jan 1996, 16:51 GMT
- Re: "Punctual Equilibrium", or "evolutionary stuff",
Paul Cockshott Sat 13 Jan 1996, 20:15 GMT
- Re: "Punctual Equilibrium", or "evolutionary stuff",
John R. Ernst Sat 13 Jan 1996, 21:01 GMT
- Re: "Punctual Equilibrium", or "evolutionary stuff",
Charles K. MacKay Sun 14 Jan 1996, 03:48 GMT
- Re: "Punctual Equilibrium", or "evolutionary stuff",
John R. Ernst Sun 14 Jan 1996, 06:17 GMT
- Romania, icons of nationalism/ 'racism',
Lisa Rogers Sat 13 Jan 1996, 05:08 GMT
- AM,
glevy Sat 13 Jan 1996, 04:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]