Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: the labor of the bees?
- Subject: Re: the labor of the bees?
- From: glevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 18:21:08 -0500 (EST)
> Lisa: Well, thanks for thinking of me, and I have addressed it a
> bit, following your comment. But I'm curious Jerry, why bees? What
> do they do that looks more like "labor" than other species? Or I
> guess the question is what is your definition of "labor"?
> Curious,
> Lisa
Dear Curious Lisa:
Bees were chosen at random, in part, because it is obvious that there is
a "social organization" and a "division of labor". To be sure, the
"labor" of bees is different from the labor of humans. Obviously, the
question of instinct and genetics play a significant role in the "labor" of
bees. I have no doubt, though, that you are more familiar with bees than
I am and I expect a forthcoming 10K lecture on bees.
Jerry
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- AM,
glevy Sat 13 Jan 1996, 04:54 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: AM,
David McInerney Sat 13 Jan 1996, 06:06 GMT
- the labor of the bees?,
Lisa Rogers Sat 13 Jan 1996, 04:23 GMT
- books I have bought / may buy,
Lisa Rogers Sat 13 Jan 1996, 04:13 GMT
- Reply to Lou on AM,
David McInerney Sat 13 Jan 1996, 03:44 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]