Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: The materialist road...-- Whoops, Ralphie, I "fucked-up"!
- Subject: Re: The materialist road...-- Whoops, Ralphie, I "fucked-up"!
- From: davidmci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David McInerney)
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 20:00:00 +1100
Whoops! Ralph, I still love your posts, but I am afraid in my reply I
thought you had said the opposite of what you in fact did. Oh well, so you
really weren't saying anything new at all.
>Oh Ralph! Welcome back! How I've missed you!
>
> Fri, 12 Jan 1996 Ralph wrote:
>
>>Jukka, your post on materialism, structure and agency, and
>>Althusser was very good. If you can get something out of this
>>Lacanian crap, good for you. However, Lacan and the Slovenians
>>sound very unappealing even by your description.
>>
><cut>
>>
>>The category of the subject is not just the province of precious
>>academics and philosophers. Resurrecting the subject has always
>>been part and parcel of the fight against Stalinism.<cut>
Duh! I read it as: " Resurrecting the subject has always been part and
parcel of Stalinism". This *would* have been very unlike you Ralph,
wouldn't it! Disregard the following warm and heartfelt greeting. I
consider you marxist-humanist membership card to still be valid.
>
>Oh Ralph! Welcome to the Althusserian fold comrade! This was Althusser's
>main thesis on Stalinism in 'The Transformation of Philosophy'. You've
>left your theoretical humanist past behind you!
>
>>So if
>>we can strangle Shawgi Tell with the entrails of David McInerney,
>>we can help prevent the reoccurrence of the disease.
However, Ralphie, I consider the following positions to still ring true:
>I think I could do a better job of strangling Stalinists if I were
>alive. As a major opponent of the philosophy of the subject on this list,
>by your criteria I'm just the man to do it.
>
>>Instead of wasting any more time over the Parisian Strangler, I
>>recommend checking out the recent discussion on the Bhaskar list
>>of structure and agency, which is on a much higher level.
>
>Oh Ralph! You've bought into the infantile disorder of Bhaskarism!
>Bhaskar attempts to use Althusser to give himself Marxist status, and
>foolishly believes that Althusserian theory supports his critical realist
>approach. The majority of anglo-Althusserians these days love Bhaskar and
>want to be adopted by him as his children. If you are going to become an
>Althusserian I implore you to do it properly.
Mr. David McInerney,
Political Science Program, Research School of Social Sciences,
The Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., AUSTRALIA 0200.
e-mail: davidmci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ph: (06) 249 2134; fax: (06) 249 3051
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Rational Choice/Analytical M., Schwartz, Wood. Vulgar Liberalism,
Carrol Cox Sat 13 Jan 1996, 16:01 GMT
- The Size Question,
LeoCasey Sat 13 Jan 1996, 15:22 GMT
- On Stalinism and Trotskyism (was Re: Carlos on Stalinism),
Luciano Dondero Sat 13 Jan 1996, 11:32 GMT
- Re: The materialist road...-- Whoops, Ralphie, I "fucked-up"!,
David McInerney Sat 13 Jan 1996, 09:00 GMT
- Re: Analytical Marxism -- Errata,
David McInerney Sat 13 Jan 1996, 08:04 GMT
- AM & PE,
John R. Ernst Sat 13 Jan 1996, 07:44 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: AM & PE,
boddhisatva Sat 13 Jan 1996, 10:08 GMT
- Re: AM & PE,
Paul Cockshott Sun 14 Jan 1996, 00:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]