Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Development of productive Forces - Questions
- Subject: Re: Development of productive Forces - Questions
- From: Adam Rose <adam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 96 08:54:34 GMT
>
> The above department schema, I believe, began with the publication of
> Sweezy's _The Theory Of Capitalist Development_ (1942) which built on the
> Bortkiewicz (1907) "solution to the transformation problem."
>
> Of course, many other authors have suggested the use of the three
> department reproduction schemes. Rosa Luxemburg, for instance,
> proposed that Department 3 should be for the production of the money
> commodity, gold (which Marx had included in Dept. 1). However,
> the use of 3 departments, as distinct from 2, was not pioneered by Marx.
>
> Jerry
But Marx did talk about production for the luxury consumption of the ruling
class
separately from Departments I + II , didn't he ? And he specifically mentions
this as a potential counter vailing tendency to the falling rate of profit,
doesn't
he ?
Adam
Adam Rose
SWP
Manchester
UK
---------------------------------------------------------------
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: On Crime and Police (Murder rates),
Doug Henwood Mon 08 Jan 1996, 14:39 GMT
- Re: Gimme that old-time religion,
Bryan A. Alexander Mon 08 Jan 1996, 14:05 GMT
- Re: Development of productive Forces - Questions,
Adam Rose Mon 08 Jan 1996, 13:39 GMT
- Re: Re : France - sur Le Pen et le Front National.,
Adam Rose Mon 08 Jan 1996, 13:14 GMT
- Re: Marx and Judaism,
Adam Rose Mon 08 Jan 1996, 13:01 GMT
- Re: Darwin and Marx,
Adam Rose Mon 08 Jan 1996, 12:35 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]