Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Bordiga and stalinism
- Subject: Re: Bordiga and stalinism
- From: "Marcus Strom" <MSTROM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 11:10:12 GMT+10
> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 95 09:10:12 GMT
> From: Adam Rose <adam@xxxxxxxx>
Adam commented on the following exchange:
> > At 14.43 06/12/95 GMT+10, Marcus wrote:
> >
> >
> > >And yet I disagree with the below. If the party is the 'free
> > >association of militants', then any member should be able to fight in
> > >the party for a position shouldn't they.
> >
> > Mauro jr:
> > free association means that the action of associate to it is free, not
> > obliged.
> > >It is practice which will
> > >sort people out, not a bureaucratic rule. Any opportunist can agree
> > >with anything to their hearts content - as long as it gets them where
> > >they want to go. The difference in a communist party is that if they
> > >aren't being communists in practice, then they will stick out like
> > >sore thumbs.
> > >Some people who want to leave politics find the big difference to
> > >debate out to leave. We should not give them the excuse.
> >
> > Agreed
> > >Rule 21 gives them the excuse. They should be excluded on their political
> > >practice, not their bureaucratic adherence to some rule.
> >
>
Adam's comment:
> I think this discussion has become completely ahistorical.
>
> The 21 conditions were specifically designed for a situation when the Russian
> Revolution had enourmous prestige. Mass centrist parties were queing up to
> join
> the third international. Under these circumstances, the main danger was that
> the revolutionary members of these parties would bring their centrist leaders
> with them.
>
> The 21 conditions were a historically specific mechanism to try to keep them
> out,
> not some revolutionary catechism valid for all time.
>
> There is a debate to be had about democratic centralism, ( although ultimately
> these questions are decided in practise not in discussion ) but it shouldn't
> be
> based on "for or against the 21st condition" !
>
Adam...
.... I just wanted to agree with you! It hasn't happened that often
so it's good to take the opportunity.
Marcus
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Bordiga and stalinism, (continued)
- Re: Bordiga and stalinism,
Mauro junior Tue 05 Dec 1995, 18:01 GMT
- Re: Bordiga and stalinism,
Marcus Strom Wed 06 Dec 1995, 04:43 GMT
- Re: Bordiga and stalinism,
Mauro junior Thu 07 Dec 1995, 02:29 GMT
- Re: Bordiga and stalinism,
Adam Rose Thu 07 Dec 1995, 09:10 GMT
- Re: Bordiga and stalinism,
Marcus Strom Fri 08 Dec 1995, 01:10 GMT
- Tom Lewis on Chaos Theory and Marxism,
Chris, London Sun 03 Dec 1995, 22:21 GMT
- Bogdanov repost,
Louis N Proyect Sun 03 Dec 1995, 21:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]