Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence
- Subject: Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence
- From: glevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 09:16:24 -0400 (EDT)
Would list members not agree that there is a difference between
popularism (even with a reactionary component) and a fascist movement?
I am disturbed by the over-eagerness of some to refer to the MMM as an
event led by a fascist. Wouldn't that be better described as a popularist
movement? [this, of course, gets us back to the question of how we
understand fascism].
Jerry
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Marx and Free Fpeech (fwd), (continued)
- Yugoslavia again. International Law,
Lorenzo Penya Fri 20 Oct 1995, 11:38 GMT
- Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence,
jones/bhandari Fri 20 Oct 1995, 11:02 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence,
Louis N Proyect Fri 20 Oct 1995, 12:07 GMT
- Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence,
glevy Fri 20 Oct 1995, 13:16 GMT
- Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence,
Jim Jaszewski Fri 20 Oct 1995, 14:13 GMT
- Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence,
Louis N Proyect Fri 20 Oct 1995, 14:13 GMT
- Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence,
Judith L. Poxon Fri 20 Oct 1995, 15:20 GMT
- Re: fascism and MMM; purity and ambivalence,
Jeffrey Booth Fri 20 Oct 1995, 18:40 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]