Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion
- Subject: Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion
- From: glevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 09:04:34 -0400 (EDT)
Rakesh wrote:
> I have been privately informed that Mattick's value theory is not
> sufficiently dynamic in the light of the recent advances of Ernst, Kliman,
> Freeman. To the criticism of Mattick, one should note that his last book
> Marxism: Last Refuge of the Bourgeoisie? is very dynamic-- see pp. 91ff.
>
I don't understand this criticism of Mattick. Will whoever "privately
informed" Rakesh of this belief please explain it to the list?
Kliman and Freeman's articles are recent, John's is not.
Aside to Steve: if you want us to comment meaningfully on your posts,
could you please try to keep the byte count down? The length makes it too
time-consuming to "cut and paste."
Jerry
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion, (continued)
- Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion,
Scott Marshall Tue 17 Oct 1995, 13:16 GMT
- Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion,
Steve . Keen Wed 18 Oct 1995, 01:55 GMT
- Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion,
glevy Wed 18 Oct 1995, 03:05 GMT
- Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion,
jones/bhandari Wed 18 Oct 1995, 10:48 GMT
- Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion,
glevy Wed 18 Oct 1995, 13:04 GMT
- Re: Keen/Ernst Discussion,
Scott Marshall Thu 19 Oct 1995, 13:01 GMT
- RIDDLE ME THIS -- NO COCKFEST BACKLASH?,
Ralph Dumain Tue 17 Oct 1995, 06:23 GMT
- value,
James Miller Tue 17 Oct 1995, 04:49 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: value,
Steve . Keen Tue 17 Oct 1995, 07:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]