Re: BHASKAR: REDISCOVERY OF REALITY

[Jim Jaszewski <jjazz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 6 Sep 1995, HANS DESPAIN wrote:

> Much of Bhaskar may be very fimilar to Marxists, however, the (strong)
> Marxian presence is only one philosophical moment found in Bhaksar.  For:
> "The development of transcendental or critical realism presupposes a
> philosophical method imbued with Aristotelian, Baconian, Lockean,
> Leibnizian, Kantian, Hegelian and Marixan moments.

        Excuse me;  the above list is very impressive to the eye, but
I've always thought that once a philosopher's thought has been subsumed
in a larger, more inclusive theory that it wasn't necessary to consider
it separately.  I would think many of the names above are superfluous to
just saying `Marx'....

        You are saying that there are `methods' peculiar to these men
which are alian to marxist thought?



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    ++++++++++++++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++++++++++
    +++++++++ if you agree copy these 3 sentences in your own sig +++++
    ++++ more info: http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm ++++
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Those who would give up essential Liberty,              Benjamin Franklin
to purchase a little temporary Safety,                  Pennsylvania Assembly
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.                     Nov. 11, 1755
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Jaszewski <jjazz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.freenet.hamilton.on.ca/~ab975/Profile.html
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=




     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

     ------------------