Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: How we write
On Thu, 7 Sep 1995, jones/bhandari wrote:
> Juan, I am having trouble with this passage:
Hey, let _me_ try. (the more the merrier..!)
> "Although on the basis of capitalist production the social character of
> their production confronts the mass of immediate producers in the form of a
> strict governing authority,
The famous contradiction of the social character of modern
production vs. it's formally `private' ownership.
and the social mechanism of the labor process
> has received here a completely hierarchical articulation
A further development of the contradiction, pointing out that
hierarchy is, by definition, anti-social.
--though this
> authority accrues to its bearers only to as the personification of the
> conditions of labor vis-a-vis labour itself, not to them as political or
> theocratic rulers as in earlier forms of production
The modern relations of production do not need to rely on received
authority from gods or other `authorities' -- merely `property rights'.
--the most complete
> anarchy reigns among the bearers of this authority, the capitalists
> themselves, who confront one another simply as owners of commodities, and
> within this anarchy the social interconnection of production prevails over
> individual caprice only as an overwhelming natural law."
That `authority' -- which heretofore has rested on rigid
hierarchical systems -- is here and now resting on the most flimsy of
foundations: the anarchy of competition -- now fittingly `completes the
spiral', necessarily giving-up place of importance to the true basis of
this whole system -- _social_ production.
Is that close enuff, Juan?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
++++++++++++++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++++++++++
+++++++++ if you agree copy these 3 sentences in your own sig +++++
++++ more info: http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm ++++
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Those who would give up essential Liberty, Benjamin Franklin
to purchase a little temporary Safety, Pennsylvania Assembly
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Nov. 11, 1755
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Jaszewski <jjazz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.freenet.hamilton.on.ca/~ab975/Profile.html
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: How we write, (continued)
- Re: How we write,
jones/bhandari Thu 07 Sep 1995, 22:01 GMT
- Re: How we write,
jones/bhandari Thu 07 Sep 1995, 22:48 GMT
- Re: How we write,
Zodiac Thu 07 Sep 1995, 23:35 GMT
- Re: How we write,
Jim Jaszewski Fri 08 Sep 1995, 05:59 GMT
- Re: How we write,
Jim Jaszewski Fri 08 Sep 1995, 06:34 GMT
- How we write,
Chris Burford Fri 08 Sep 1995, 06:59 GMT
- Re: How we write,
Jeffrey Booth Fri 08 Sep 1995, 13:58 GMT
- Re: How we write,
Ralph Dumain Fri 08 Sep 1995, 14:35 GMT
- How we write,
Chris Burford Fri 08 Sep 1995, 23:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]