Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: How we write




On Thu, 7 Sep 1995, jones/bhandari wrote:

> Juan, I am having trouble with this passage:

Hey, let _me_ try. (the more the merrier..!)


> "Although on the basis of capitalist production the social character of
> their production confronts the mass of immediate producers in the form of a
> strict governing authority,

The famous contradiction of the social character of modern
production vs. it's formally `private' ownership.


and the social mechanism of the labor process
> has received here a completely hierarchical articulation

A further development of the contradiction, pointing out that
hierarchy is, by definition, anti-social.


--though this
> authority accrues to its bearers only to as the personification of the
> conditions of labor vis-a-vis labour itself, not to them as political or
> theocratic rulers as in earlier forms of production

The modern relations of production do not need to rely on received
authority from gods or other `authorities' -- merely `property rights'.


--the most complete
> anarchy reigns among the bearers of this authority, the capitalists
> themselves, who confront one another simply as owners of commodities, and
> within this anarchy the social interconnection of production prevails over
> individual caprice only as an overwhelming natural law."

That `authority' -- which heretofore has rested on rigid
hierarchical systems -- is here and now resting on the most flimsy of
foundations: the anarchy of competition -- now fittingly `completes the
spiral', necessarily giving-up place of importance to the true basis of
this whole system -- _social_ production.

Is that close enuff, Juan?


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
++++++++++++++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++++++++++
+++++++++ if you agree copy these 3 sentences in your own sig +++++
++++ more info: http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm ++++
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Those who would give up essential Liberty, Benjamin Franklin
to purchase a little temporary Safety, Pennsylvania Assembly
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Nov. 11, 1755
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Jaszewski <jjazz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.freenet.hamilton.on.ca/~ab975/Profile.html
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=




--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

------------------



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]