Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: How we write
I just want to add that if we try to think through seriously Marx's
emphasis on the FORM OF VALUE in the first volume and the completion of the
theory of fetishism in the third volume, Juan's posts are tremendoulsy
insightful.
I was just reading through his exchange with Allin (I have been saving
Juan's posts and exchanges for study at a later date) and it seems to me
that Juan is not much more difficult than Marx himself. Perhaps many of us
agree that the first chapters of Capital (in which Marx analyzes the FORMS
OF VALUE in order to understand the historical specificity of bourgeois
society) and the theory of fetishism which is itself a theory of human
freedom are both dispensable parts of Marx's revolutionary critique.
Perhaps many of us are arguing that Marx is too difficult, that he remains
entranced by the rococco of the dialectic.
Rakesh
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- NCDM: Music for Chiapas y Democracia, Sep 6,
Harry M. Cleaver Thu 07 Sep 1995, 22:07 GMT
- U.S.-Tepoztlan links, Sept 6,
Harry M. Cleaver Thu 07 Sep 1995, 22:07 GMT
- How we write,
Chris Burford Thu 07 Sep 1995, 20:20 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: How we write,
jones/bhandari Thu 07 Sep 1995, 22:01 GMT
- Re: How we write,
jones/bhandari Thu 07 Sep 1995, 22:48 GMT
- Re: How we write,
Zodiac Thu 07 Sep 1995, 23:35 GMT
- Re: How we write,
Jim Jaszewski Fri 08 Sep 1995, 05:59 GMT
- Re: How we write,
Jim Jaszewski Fri 08 Sep 1995, 06:34 GMT
- How we write,
Chris Burford Fri 08 Sep 1995, 06:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]