Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: world monopoly
Will wrote:
> Nationalised companies seldom compete effectivly on the market with TNCs
> that can garner economies of scale by producing and selling globally.
> This was why TNCs appeared in the first place. [snip]
I disagree with the idea stated above that TNC's "appeared in the first
place" because "nationalized companies seldom compete on the market with
TNCs." While TNCs have advantages over nationalized companies, the growth
of TNCs pre-dates the growth of nationalized companies. Also, the growth
of TNCs could be seen as a logical consequence of the international
concentration and centralization of capital rather than a response to
nationalization.
Jerry
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: world monopoly, (continued)
- Re: world monopoly,
Paul Cockshott Sat 02 Sep 1995, 07:11 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
glevy Sat 02 Sep 1995, 17:42 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
Jim Jaszewski Mon 04 Sep 1995, 05:37 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
wdrb Mon 04 Sep 1995, 12:37 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
glevy Mon 04 Sep 1995, 17:14 GMT
- Re: Training the Bosnian army,
Bryan A. Alexander Fri 01 Sep 1995, 07:35 GMT
- Re: Goethe Institute,
Chris Burford Fri 01 Sep 1995, 06:43 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]