Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: world monopoly
- Subject: Re: world monopoly
- From: wpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Cockshott)
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 95 23:59:27 PDT
Why should the ruling class have any opposition to monopoly in
these fields?
CPUs for Pcs
Intel and Power PC combine (motorola, apple, IBM)
There are tremendous advantages to having a single instruction set for
computers. But note that AMD, Chips and Technologies, IBM,
TI etc all make Intel compatible machines.
RAM
(Texas,Siemmens, NEC, Hitachi)
There is not much that can be done about the high organic composition
of capital in this industry. Circa $1billion per plant.
Big aero engines
Pratt and Whitney (United Tech), GEC (US)
Rolls Royce
Similarly very high development costs, though a Russian competitor
may arise.
Big power generators
ABB
Degree of monopoly overstated, Thompson, Seimens, GEC ( US and UK)
Westinghouse + large Japanese companies all involved here.
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- world monopoly,
wdrb Fri 01 Sep 1995, 08:22 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: world monopoly,
glevy Fri 01 Sep 1995, 13:03 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
wdrb Fri 01 Sep 1995, 15:51 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
glevy Fri 01 Sep 1995, 16:26 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
Paul Cockshott Sat 02 Sep 1995, 06:59 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
Paul Cockshott Sat 02 Sep 1995, 07:11 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
glevy Sat 02 Sep 1995, 17:42 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
Jim Jaszewski Mon 04 Sep 1995, 05:37 GMT
- Re: world monopoly,
wdrb Mon 04 Sep 1995, 12:37 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]