Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann
John made the following aside in his comments on Rakesh's last post:
6. I am a bit leary of reading Marx into Minisky as I'm still unsure of how
technical change is treated in the Goodwin models to which Steve refers.
...
To answer the implied query, technical change is simply taken as a given
constant. Thus, describing the initial labor productivity as a0, he
has
a(t) = a0 * e^(alpha * t)
so that labor productivity rises exponentially with time. This is
related to the level of output:
Y(t) = a(t) * L(t)
so that, since capitalists first make their output decisions (Y(t)),
the level of productivity plays a role in determining employment.
Cheers,
Steve
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann, (continued)
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
jones/bhandari Thu 24 Aug 1995, 09:55 GMT
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
John R. Ernst Thu 24 Aug 1995, 15:10 GMT
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
P8475423 Thu 24 Aug 1995, 22:53 GMT
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
John R. Ernst Fri 25 Aug 1995, 05:10 GMT
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
P8475423 Fri 25 Aug 1995, 06:09 GMT
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
jones/bhandari Fri 25 Aug 1995, 09:38 GMT
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
glevy Fri 25 Aug 1995, 23:48 GMT
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
Paul Cockshott Sat 26 Aug 1995, 04:16 GMT
- Re: globalisation/Landauer/Grossmann,
Jim Jaszewski Sat 26 Aug 1995, 20:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]