Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Value and exchange value
- Subject: Re: Value and exchange value
- From: glevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 22:44:05 -0400 (EDT)
> > Paul C.
> > -------
> > > Jerry asks a number of questions about the relationship
> > > between Marx and the economists whom he criticised. He
> > > is probably right here, though the views of these early
> > > 19th century economists are no longer of great import.
> >
> > Jerry
> > -----
> > Do you really think that Ricardo's method and his theory of value is
> > "of no great import today"? I believe that they are of great import
> > for understanding the methodology of a certain school of thought in
> > economics today. I also believe that Marx's explanation of the method
> > and the value theories of Torrens, James Mill, and McCulloch is of
> > relevance today for understanding at least one school of thought.
> >
>
>
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: value and exchange value, (continued)
- Re: value and exchange value,
Howie Chodos Fri 04 Aug 1995, 03:41 GMT
- Re: value and exchange value,
glevy Fri 04 Aug 1995, 05:12 GMT
- Re: value and exchange value,
glevy Fri 04 Aug 1995, 15:53 GMT
- Re: value and exchange value,
P8475423 Fri 04 Aug 1995, 20:41 GMT
- Re: Value and exchange value,
glevy Sat 05 Aug 1995, 02:44 GMT
- Re: Value and exchange value,
glevy Sat 05 Aug 1995, 23:52 GMT
- Re: Value and exchange value,
marquit Sun 06 Aug 1995, 00:49 GMT
- Re: Value and exchange value,
glevy Sun 06 Aug 1995, 03:35 GMT
- Re: Value and exchange value,
Chris Burford Sun 06 Aug 1995, 07:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]