Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: The Right of Nations to Self Determination
- Subject: Re: The Right of Nations to Self Determination
- From: glevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 06:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
Excerpting:
Roderick Hay
------------
>
> I don't understand this "right of nations to self-determination". What is
> a nation but a bourgeois reification. The workers have no nation.
>
> Chris B:
> ---------
>
> There is hardly a more important question to clarify if we want to
> promote unity between working people against capital, in an increasingly
> chaotic world. (snip) [Roderick's] comment above might be marxian,
> but, in the twentieth century, it is no way dialectical or materialist.
>
Jerry
-----
I agree *completely* with Chris B.'s comment above. It is true that
workers have class interests internationally which are different from
the class interests of the bourgeoisie in each of our capitalist
nations. It is also true that nationalism, historically, has been a
means through which workers have been divided internationally and a
force that has both resulted in false consciousness and untold
suffering and death for workers. But, all nations and forms of
nationalism are not the same. Similarly, the meaning of nations and
nationalism change historically and vary globally.
To simply say that "workers have no nation" and to deny the right of
(some) nations to self-determination is, as Chris says, neither
dialectical, in the sense that it fails to grasp the contradictory nature
of the nation and nations, or materialist, in the sense that it
fails to account for important aspects of material reality. Any
statement completely abstracted from material reality is false.
To give a couple of examples. The nationalism of the ANC in South
Africa was not the same as the nationalism of the white working class
during the apartheid period. Similarly, the nationalism of the Irish
is different from the nationalism of the British. Nationalism can be a
essentially reactionary force in certain areas and historical contexts
and an essentially progressive force in other areas and contexts.
Consequently, national self-determination can be a reactionary concept
in some contexts (and should be opposed by class-conscious workers and
Marxists) and a progressive concept in other contexts (and should be
supported by class-conscious workers and Marxists).
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Law & Economics, (continued)
- HOT OFF THE PRESS!,
Roger Deacon Fri 04 Aug 1995, 09:37 GMT
- The Right of Nations to Self Determination,
Chris Burford Fri 04 Aug 1995, 06:54 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: The Right of Nations to Self Determination,
glevy Fri 04 Aug 1995, 10:58 GMT
- Re: The Right of Nations to Self Determination,
jwalker Fri 04 Aug 1995, 13:08 GMT
- Re: The Right of Nations to Self Determination,
Howie Chodos Fri 04 Aug 1995, 15:04 GMT
- Re: The Right of Nations to Self Determination -Reply,
Lisa Rogers Fri 04 Aug 1995, 17:26 GMT
- Re: The Right of Nations to Self Determination,
Jim Jaszewski Fri 04 Aug 1995, 19:10 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]