Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
re: "Marx' LTV"
Marx said that CAPITALISM acts as if value is created by labor, CAP
treats labor as a commodity, etc. And we don't expect capitalism to be
internally consistent, do we.
I found Marx rather compelling, reading him with a somewhat forgiving
[and non-economist] eye. If parts of his argument cannot hold up to
modern, rigorous, quantitative methods, I can live with that. Maybe we
can come up with even better analyses of how and why Capitalism SUCKS. A
desire for justice and human growth will still unite us, no?
BTW, does anybody think that Marx was "totally objective" in his
analyses, and was never swayed by his beliefs and his agenda, to tweak
his analysis, bend his logic or shape his arguments? If so, he must be
the only such person.
Lisa Rogers
UofUgstu
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Marvelous talking pigs! <fwd>,
Tom Condit Wed 07 Jun 1995, 23:34 GMT
- Re: Creativity and the LTV,
lisa rogers Wed 07 Jun 1995, 22:37 GMT
- re: "Marx' LTV",
lisa rogers Wed 07 Jun 1995, 22:32 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- re: "Marx' LTV",
Justin Schwartz Thu 08 Jun 1995, 01:38 GMT
- Re: Marx and morality,
Michael Hesemann Wed 07 Jun 1995, 19:18 GMT
- Their morals and ours,
Alex Trotter Wed 07 Jun 1995, 17:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]