Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: globalization/fictitious K
To whom...,
Ultimately, it seems to me unreasonable that capital could in any
way "overcome" the law of surplus value. All economy rests on a positive
form of checks and balances : The balances don't tilt unless the checks come
in (I couldn't resist, but seriously....). Current estimates of worker
productivity must take into account the infrastructure created by previous
generations of workers - which is the birthright of the modern proletariat.
That birthright also includes legal control through ownership of all capital.
Legal control is every bit as important as derived economic benefit.
Contradiction surely endures.
peace
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Call Pepsi! (fwd), (continued)
- [Chris Burford <cburford@gn.apc.org>: Re: globalizatio of capital],
boddhisatva Wed 26 Apr 1995, 08:05 GMT
- globalization/fictitious K,
jones/bhandari Wed 26 Apr 1995, 06:58 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: globalization/fictitious K,
jones/bhandari Thu 27 Apr 1995, 03:41 GMT
- Re: globalization/fictitious K,
boddhisatva Thu 27 Apr 1995, 04:42 GMT
- Re: globalization/fictitious K,
Chris Burford Thu 27 Apr 1995, 07:03 GMT
- Re: globalization/fictitious K,
Steve Wright Fri 28 Apr 1995, 00:18 GMT
- Re: globalization/fictitious K,
Chris Burford Fri 28 Apr 1995, 06:12 GMT
- Re: globalization/fictitious K,
Kim Brian Gillespie Sat 29 Apr 1995, 19:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]