Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: value constancy
In response to Rakesh's posting of 4 April 1995 (06:21:05.40):
The passage quoted from Postone is just a paraphrase of arguements made by
Marx (in a few places). The issue is not that higher productivity creates
additional value _per se_, but that above-average productivity generates
above-average value (per unit of labor-time).
The passage quoted from Grossmann isn't all that clear, but it seems NOT
to indicate that greater productivity generates greater value, but that
a worker, when productivity is greater, uses up more means of production
per unit of labor-time, and thus transfers more value to the value of
products. In THIS sense, with greater productivity, the C used up is
greater, and the value of the GROSS product will be greater. Marx also
says this.
All this is very different from saying that, for the TOTAL social capital, the
NEW value CREATED can vary independently of the amount of socially necessary
labor extracted. This Marx denied, as do I.
(By the way, my view is not special in this regard. This is all the ABCs
of _Capital_.)
Andrew Kliman
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Final RETHINKING MARXISM Conference Schedule,
Richard Wolff Tue 04 Apr 1995, 18:14 GMT
- Realism Conference Announcement,
Bill Bowring Tue 04 Apr 1995, 12:21 GMT
- value constancy,
jones/bhandari Tue 04 Apr 1995, 10:12 GMT
- Mayans,
Tom Condit Tue 04 Apr 1995, 03:12 GMT
- Ron Press' observation,
jones/bhandari Mon 03 Apr 1995, 23:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]