Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: Use Value (and not really Aesthetics)



This is totally reminiscent and consistent, in my mind, with the powerful
green critique of what we call capitalism - that it "externalises the
costs of production" - ie onto the environment, and I would say, onto the
quality of human life too.

Chris Burford
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From owner-marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri Mar 31 20:24:08 1995
> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 12:46:00 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Kevin T. Mahoney" <ktmahone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-Sender: ktmahone@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Use Value (and not really Aesthetics)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Sender: owner-marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> i think that howie raises some important issues here in terms of how to
> situate domestic labour--what is beig referred to here as the "domestic
> mode of production." i think howie is right to suggest that domestic
> labor does indeed produce commodities, namely labor power. however, what
> is important about this is that the production of labor power is
> predominatly unpaid labor. the important part about this is that we can
> see how capitalism needs "other" systems of production along side itself
> to appropriate and exploit and ultimately submit to the logic of
> commodity production. this is to suggest that while capitalism is
> clearly the dominant mode of production, there are parallel systems of
> production that are present, yet incorporated into the "logic" of
> capitalist production. In other words, these "other" systems of
> production are not "outside" capitalism in the sense that they offer
> alternative possibilities for resistance, they are fully integrated into
> the system of production that is capitalism, it is just that they are not
> organized in the same manner. they contribute to capitalism even as they
> are not synonymous with capitalism.


--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

------------------



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]