Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Insurance industry vrs. Marx
Prior to the rise of the insurance industry, the banking interests
held the political power in the United States. However today, I
understand that it is the major insurance companies which by and
large own the banking establishments. So the chain of command
in state monopoly capitalism ultimately leads us to the insurance
industry, does it not?
If this is the case, should not a modern critique of capitalism
(based on the fine heritage of Marx) include a serious analysis of
the structure and role of the insurance industry(private and state-
sponsored) in maintaining the contemporary capitalist system?
The rise in temporary workers is a case in point. The argument I
have often heard goes something like this: an employer cannot
afford to hire permanent help because of the state insurance costs
involved(i.e., Workman's Compensation). Realizing this, an
entrepreneur sets up a temporary labor pool which will take on
those exorbitant insurance costs instead, the object being to
entice prospective employers to go through a middleman for the
temporary help. If the temporary labor pool can attract enough
laborers to be sent out for various work assignments, that business
can make a small profit for itself, and at the same time, save the
employers from the expense of paying insurance for temporary help.
Unfortunately, the losers are the proletariat: the poor workers
are paid only the minimum wages for the work, and in many cases end
up being "permanent" temporary laborers.
Insurance is a reverse form of gambling by the masses, I believe, in
that you are betting(by paying a monthly life insurance premium,
for example) that you will "crap out" sooner or later in this
capitalist game of life, and only under those circumstances do you
win the "ante". However, the laws of probability are such that
most people paying insurance premiums do not "crap out" in the
game(i.e., they are not seriously injured or stricken with an
infirmity) and thus do not ever get to collect the "ante".
How is the concept of social insurance considered in socialist
theory? Shouldn't our main thrust against capitalism in the U.S.
be directed towards the insurance industry?
n.gant
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]