Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Bhaskar and dialectics
After reading Ralph Dumain's posting about Bhaskar's 'constant barrage of
impenetrable, abstract prose, indulging in unbridled name- and
concept-dropping with every word, ' etc etc, I was prompted to re-read a
review of a book he edited called _A Meeting of Minds: Socialists discuss
philosophy - towards a new symposium_. The review was called 'Critical
Unrealism', and appeared in Radical Chains, 1993, no 4.
Initially, I dismissed the review as mere anti-intellectualism. Consider
the following quote about Bhaskar's discussion of Rorty's 'Nietzschean
superstructures' and 'linguistified monisms':
'This is a lot of '-ists' and '-eans' to be crammed into less than two
pages of text. It is not, however, the result of trying to distil the
essence of his longer works into a small space. Readers of Bhaskar's
weightier tomes - the Possibility of Naturalism, for example - will have
noticed the same tendency at work there. The suspicion is that the
adjectives - 'positivist', 'Nietzschean', 'superidealist', and so on - are
doing all the work. They are surrogates for real argument. What exactly is
a 'dualist overly anti-naturalist hue'? How would you recognise a
'superidealist epistemology' if you encountered one?'
Nonetheless, I remember that Bhaskar's piece in the 3 volume 'Issues in
Marxist Philosophy' set published in the 1970's (I could get the exact
reference if anyone is interested) made a huge impact on me in schematising
my understanding of different approaches to epistemology and social
scientific knowledge.
I'd be curious as to whether list-contributors believe that Bhaskar is
becoming not only less clear but less useful, as my impression is that his
earlier work has influenced marxist/critical social science more than his
later work.
On a related topic, has anyone read Wal Suchting's 'Studies in Marxist
Philosophy: Three Essays' [I think this is the title]? If the issue of
epistemology revives on this mailing list, I think it would be a useful
reference.
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- COLLETTI'S ANTI-HEGELIANISM,
Ralph Dumain Tue 07 Mar 1995, 09:17 GMT
- Re: Bhaskar and dialectics,
Ralph Dumain Tue 07 Mar 1995, 07:28 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Bhaskar and dialectics,
Steve . Keen Tue 07 Mar 1995, 08:12 GMT
- Re: Bhaskar and dialectics,
Ralph Dumain Tue 07 Mar 1995, 09:14 GMT
- Re: Bhaskar and dialectics,
Adam Bandt Tue 07 Mar 1995, 11:08 GMT
- Re: Bhaskar and dialectics,
Steve Wright Wed 08 Mar 1995, 02:06 GMT
- Re: Bhaskar and dialectics,
Hans Despain Thu 09 Mar 1995, 00:43 GMT
- Re: Bhaskar and dialectics,
Ralph Dumain Thu 09 Mar 1995, 04:06 GMT
- Sanders Discussion,
TimW333521 Tue 07 Mar 1995, 05:31 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]