m-fem
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[no subject]
Opinion Leaders: U.S. Policies Major Reason for Terrorist Attacks
By Keith B. Richburg
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, December 19, 2001; 6:44 PM
PARIS, Dec. 19 -- Opinion leaders around the world say the United
States is admired as the land of opportunity and democratic ideals,
but large numbers see American policies as a major reason for the
terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, according to a new survey of "elite"
opinion in two dozen nations.
By large majorities, a sampling of the political, media and business
elite on five continents believe the United States is mostly acting
unilaterally in the fight against terrorism, the survey showed. By
contrast, American opinion-makers believed by a margin of 70 percent
to 28 percent that the United States is acting jointly with its
friends, taking into account the interests of its partners in the war
on terrorism, the survey found.
The survey, by the Pew Research Center, Princeton Survey Research
Associates and the International Herald Tribune newspaper, gives
further evidence of the gap between how Americans view themselves and
how others in the world do.
Asked whether the United States and its allies should attack other
countries such as Iraq or Somalia, if found to be supporting
terrorism, half of American opinion-makers said yes, but more than
half of the non-Americans said no. Eastern Europeans, Asians and
Middle Easterners were most reluctant to extend the war beyond
Afghanistan, while Western European opinion-makers appeared evenly
divided.
When asked whether "U.S. policies and actions in the world" were
responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks, the survey showed that a
majority of those questioned outside the U.S. said they were the
cause. Only a small number of Americans thought so.
Likewise, American opinion-makers overwhelmingly expressed the view
that the United States is disliked in the world for its support of
Israel. That reason also was given by elites in the Middle East. But
outsidethe Middle East, respondents said resentment of U.S. power and
the growing gap between rich and poor were more important factors.
The survey canvassed the views of opinion-setters in Europe, Asia,
Latin America, Africa and the Middle East, and was conducted from Nov.
12 to Dec. 13, well after the terror attacks and in the midst of the
war in Afghanistan.
The findings were based on 275 interviews with persons identified as
"influential" in either government, politics, culture, the media or
business. Some 40 interviews were conducted in the U.S., and
approximately 10 each in separate countries in Europe, Latin America,
Asia, Africa and the Middle East. The findings are the latest in Pew's
"Global Attitudes Project," initially intended to primarily measure
world views on globalization, but will now survey attitudes to the new
war on terrorism.
Most striking about the latest survey, said Pew Research Center
director Andrew Kohut, is that "people are saying this is a new
chapter in history, but when you look at how elites characterize
public opinion about America, it's very familiar - it's this love-hate
thing."
"And there's this big gap," Kohut said. For example, he said, when
elites were asked the reasons why people in their country like the
United States, large majorities everywhere - from 63 percent in
Western Europe to a full 86 percent in the Middle East - said
America's scientific and technological advances were most admired.
However only 32 percent of American opinion-makers thought that was a
reason the U.S. was admired in the world.
American opinion-makers, by 52 percent, thought America was admired
because it does "a lot of good around the world." By contrast,
majorities everywhere else on earth thought America's supposed good
works were a minor reason or not a reason at all that the country was
admired.
On the war against terrorism, "it's a very mixed image," Kohut said.
Overall, opinion leaders say large numbers of people in their
countries are sympathetic to America after the terrorist attacks. But
at the same time, surprisingly large numbers say people in their
countries feel America is "overreacting" to the terrorist attacks; 53
percent say so in Eastern Europe and Russia, 62 percent say so in the
Middle East, 40 percent say so in Latin America and 42 percent in
Asia. Only in Europe did a small percentage, just 27 percent, think
the U.S. was "overreacting."
- Thread context:
- Southwest Labor Studies Association Call for Papers,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 30 Dec 2001, 19:07 GMT
- Query on Anti-Colonial Revolts,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 22 Dec 2001, 19:15 GMT
- Where Are the Women? (by Sara Austin),
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 22 Dec 2001, 00:41 GMT
- The Legacy Project,
Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 21 Dec 2001, 08:04 GMT
- [no subject],
Charles Brown Thu 20 Dec 2001, 18:19 GMT
- U.S. bears sole blame,
Charles Brown Wed 19 Dec 2001, 17:35 GMT
- National Palestinian Solidarity Student Conference (16-18 February 2002),
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 18 Dec 2001, 19:35 GMT
- National Student Antiwar Conference at Columbia U,
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 18 Dec 2001, 19:16 GMT
- Northwest Ohio Peace Coalition Challenge Local Media (Wed., Dec. 19),
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 18 Dec 2001, 19:10 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]