Charles wrote:
Read the articles. I said German romantic philosophy. Marx and Engels do not follow Schelling, and are not Romantic German Philosophes. That is a romantic and diffusely misleading characterization.
The proposition, "German romantic philosophy was a significant underpinning for Nazism" is well demonstrated in the articles I referred to. Section copied below.
Suppose that the proposition "German romantic philosophy was a significant underpinning for Nazism" is entirely correct, as I believe it is; it does not mean, however, that its reverse -- "'proto-Nazism' was a significant underpinning for German romantic philosophy -- is also correct.
Any school of thought probably has sprouted its left & right wings. Hegelianism is a good example.
Yoshie
- Re: gender-mainstreaming, (continued)
- Re: gender-mainstreaming, Martha Gimenez Fri 03 Nov 2000, 15:58 GMT
- Re: gender-mainstreaming, Doug Henwood Fri 03 Nov 2000, 16:56 GMT
- On the depth of metaphorical roots, Carrol Cox Thu 02 Nov 2000, 18:06 GMT
- Re: The rottenness of the result of German romantic philosophy,unfortunately, Charles Brown Thu 02 Nov 2000, 17:49 GMT
- Re: The rottenness of the result of German romantic philosophy, unfortunately, Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 02 Nov 2000, 22:20 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: The rottenness of the result of German romantic philosophy,unfortunately, Charles Brown Fri 03 Nov 2000, 16:15 GMT
- The rottenness of the result of German romantic philosophy, unfortunately, Charles Brown Thu 02 Nov 2000, 16:40 GMT
- Re: The rottenness of the result of German romantic philosophy,unfortunately, Carrol Cox Thu 02 Nov 2000, 17:02 GMT
- Re: From Patriarchy to Sexism (was Re: incompleteabstractionvs.empiricism), Charles Brown Wed 01 Nov 2000, 18:53 GMT