Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]

To: Margaret Trawick <trawick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, M-fem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:57:00 -0400

Margaret Trawick wrote:

I s'pose if one had a _real_ "hubby" in the house (my partner is out of the
country) one could shame him by hiring a "hubby" to do the work he's too lazy
to do.


Dunno about that. Men are extremely resistant to shaming when it
comes to cleaning toilets. More extreme measures might be necessary.

Doug

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]
  - From: bon moun

References:
- [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]
  - From: Katha Pollitt
- Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]
  - From: Margaret Trawick

Prev by Date: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]
Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]
Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]
Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Statement on New York Festival Attacks, (continued)
  - Re: Statement on New York Festival Attacks, bob brown Tue 27 Jun 2000, 22:09 GMT
- [Fwd: Re: 1900 House], Katha Pollitt Tue 27 Jun 2000, 02:02 GMT
  - Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House], Doug Henwood Tue 27 Jun 2000, 18:10 GMT
  - Message not available
    - Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House], Margaret Trawick Thu 29 Jun 2000, 02:08 GMT
      
      Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House], Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 16:57 GMT
      
      Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House], bon moun Thu 29 Jun 2000, 20:25 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - [Fwd: Re: 1900 House], Katha Pollitt Tue 27 Jun 2000, 14:26 GMT
  - Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House], Margaret Trawick Wed 28 Jun 2000, 06:26 GMT
    - Re: [Fwd: Re: 1900 House], bon moun Wed 28 Jun 2000, 12:41 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]