Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: >Wouldn't you say that our late and lamented Foucault (esp. the early >Foucault of _The Order of Things_ and the late Foucault of Vol. 3 of >_History of Sexuality) would disagree with the Lacan/Zizek angle here? > >A genealogy of the 'unspeakable,' anyone? Dunno, I can't speak for Foucault. My heart's with Slavoj on this one, though. But maybe I'm too steeped in psychoanalysis for my own good. Doug
- Re: Meanings and Institutions (was Re: [Fwd: Re: 7 years old Iranian, (continued)
- Re: Meanings and Institutions (was Re: [Fwd: Re: 7 years old Iranian, Michael Hoover Mon 03 May 1999, 21:55 GMT
- Writing and Religion (was Re: [Fwd: Re: 7 years old Iranian genius]) (fwd), Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 03 May 1999, 17:55 GMT
- Re: Writing and Religion, Doug Henwood Mon 03 May 1999, 17:09 GMT
- Re: Writing and Religion, Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 03 May 1999, 19:54 GMT
- Re: Writing and Religion, Doug Henwood Mon 03 May 1999, 21:00 GMT
- [Fwd: Meanings and Institutions (was Re: [Fwd: Re: 7 years old Iranian genius])], Katha Pollitt Mon 03 May 1999, 17:48 GMT
- Re: [Fwd: Re: 7 years old Iranian genius] (fwd), xxxxxx Sun 02 May 1999, 03:09 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: 7 years old Iranian genius] (fwd), Charles Brown Tue 04 May 1999, 19:35 GMT
- Re: [Fwd: Re: 7 years old Iranian genius] (fwd), Andrew Wayne Austin Tue 04 May 1999, 20:03 GMT