critical-realism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
BHA: RE: Predictions
Mint
Just a quick response. As I recall the notion of Rhythmic in DPF
(repeated patterns of social behaviour which is the foundation of a
social institution) does mean that predictions are possible or useful
(necessary to operate in society).
The fact that the system is open means that the predication will not
necessarily be perfect, that a person as a casually efficacious being
may change therefore social institutions and society can change.
John r
-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Bergman [mailto:Ann.Bergman@xxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2003 9:58 PM
To: bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: BHA: Predictions
Hi,
I have a question about the use and relevance of predictions in social
science. What I can understand of critical realism predictions are not
useful since society is an open system. At the same time critical
realist
argue for the importance of identifying structures and mechanisms which
makes society to what it is and how it works. Is not the way it is and
how
it works is in many ways predictable? We often know what to expect in
certain situations or after a certain action is taken. Is it possible
for a
critical realist to argue that the structured society and its durable
patterns are in some way possible to predict. How do you think about
these
issues?
Sorry for my terrible english
Mint
--- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named
recipient(s) only and may contain privileged and confidential information. If
received in error, please inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete
this email and any copies from your computer system network.
If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or
rely upon it and any form of disclosure, modification, distribution and/or
publication of this email is prohibited.
Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and
not the views of the Queensland Government.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- BHA: Thanks,
Ann Bergman Wed 27 Aug 2003, 11:36 GMT
- BHA: CR & Formal Ontology,
iversteg Sat 23 Aug 2003, 02:50 GMT
- BHA:,
dbwanika Wed 20 Aug 2003, 12:32 GMT
- BHA: RE: Predictions,
John Ridgway Fri 15 Aug 2003, 04:48 GMT
- BHA: Predictions,
Ann Bergman Thu 14 Aug 2003, 12:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]