This may be semantic, but surely, peope who get married, don't "reproduce" the institution of marraige, the simply perpetuate, or sustain it. It may well be that it has been transformed, or in the process of being transformed because some of the rules, laws, conventions or traditions that tend to shape the "social relations" of husband and wife, may be changing.
For example - again, closer to my research - that China, for example, sought to "buy into" the international system of exchange in its search/demand for membership of the WTO, it can be said they did not seek to "overthrow" or "replace" or "transform" this system of exchange, nor did they seek to reproduce it by creating a separate contiguous structure... Their membership - and by extension acceptance of it - merely strengthens it.
Ismail
- BHA: The Myth of Medical Pluralism: A Critical Realist Perspective, (continued)
- BHA: The Myth of Medical Pluralism: A Critical Realist Perspective, Wallace Polsom Mon 13 May 2002, 19:44 GMT
- Re: BHA: Bhaskar's five new books - publishing details, Hockeys Wed 15 May 2002, 12:09 GMT
- Re: BHA: Bhaskar's five new books - publishing details, Mervyn Hartwig Wed 15 May 2002, 22:34 GMT
- Re: BHA: Bhaskar's five new books - publishing details, howard Engelskirchen Thu 16 May 2002, 02:11 GMT
- BHA: Reproduction, Perpetuation, or Sustaining, Ismail Lagardien Thu 09 May 2002, 11:48 GMT
- Re: BHA: Reproduction, Perpetuation, or Sustaining, Richard Moodey Thu 09 May 2002, 16:21 GMT
- BHA: Let me ask, dbbwanika Thu 09 May 2002, 08:25 GMT
- Re: BHA: Let me ask, Richard Moodey Thu 09 May 2002, 15:53 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Re: BHA: Let me ask, dbbwanika Thu 09 May 2002, 17:05 GMT