Re: BHA: RE: de-onts

To: bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BHA: RE: de-onts
From: Ruth Groff <rgroff@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:28:28 -0500 (EST)

Marsh, I love this post.  I think I'd love it even if I didn't agree with it.

r.

>Pierre is not in the cafe, but then again he's not Franciois, a table, or
>standing on his head. Besides saying something is not something it's not,
>what does all this de-onting buy us?
>
>	Marsh Feldman



     --- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

Prev by Date: BHA: RE: de-onts
Next by Date: For Ruth was Re: BHA: de-onts
Previous by thread: Re: BHA: Re: causal criterion of existence
Next by thread: BHA: de-onts, etc.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- BHA: de-onts, etc., Ruth Groff Tue 27 Feb 2001, 14:13 GMT
  - BHA: Re: de-onts, etc., james.daly Tue 27 Feb 2001, 20:29 GMT
    - Re: BHA: Re: de-onts, etc., Mervyn Hartwig Thu 01 Mar 2001, 00:42 GMT
  - Re: BHA: de-onts, etc., Mervyn Hartwig Wed 28 Feb 2001, 17:10 GMT
- Re: BHA: RE: de-onts, Ruth Groff Mon 26 Feb 2001, 21:28 GMT
- Re: BHA: Re: causal criterion of existence, Ruth Groff Sun 25 Feb 2001, 15:40 GMT
  - Re: BHA: Re: causal criterion of existence, Tobin Nellhaus Sun 25 Feb 2001, 20:37 GMT
  - Re: BHA: Re: causal criterion of existence, Mervyn Hartwig Tue 27 Feb 2001, 01:33 GMT
- BHA: causal criterion of existence, Ruth Groff Sun 25 Feb 2001, 03:09 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]