Re: BHA: negativity wins

To: bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BHA: negativity wins
From: Ruth Groff <rgroff@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:39:20 -0500 (EST)

Howard,

This lengthy post of yours is just great.  I need to finish re-reading ch.
2, which I began with some enthusiasm last night but which I am now
*totally* keen to do.  I'm pretty sure I agree with everything you wrote.

r.



     --- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

Prev by Date: Re: BHA: negativity wins
Next by Date: BHA: <fwd> S.J. Gould on new genome findings
Previous by thread: BHA: negativity wins/Negativity and Conflict
Next by thread: Re: BHA: negativity wins
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- BHA: RE: Re: <fwd> S.J. Gould on new genome findings, (continued)
  - Re: BHA: <fwd> S.J. Gould on new genome findings, Erik Weissengruber Tue 20 Feb 2001, 16:08 GMT
    - Re: BHA: <fwd> S.J. Gould on new genome findings, E. Claro Wed 21 Feb 2001, 15:06 GMT
- Re: BHA: negativity wins, Ruth Groff Mon 19 Feb 2001, 16:42 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: BHA: negativity wins, Ruth Groff Sat 24 Feb 2001, 13:22 GMT
    - Re: BHA: negativity wins, Jan Straathof Sun 25 Feb 2001, 02:01 GMT
      
      Re: BHA: negativity wins, Mervyn Hartwig Sun 25 Feb 2001, 22:30 GMT
    - Re: BHA: negativity wins, Mervyn Hartwig Sun 25 Feb 2001, 21:12 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]