Absolutely. Can do. Will do. Though in some ways methinks that Macbeth is a more interesting text from a critical realist perspective. What does one make of the witches? There is a bad book by Eagleton where they are constructed as "feminists".
Still I will have a go at Lear!
Gary
At 02:08 16/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
I wonder if there would be a handful of listers willing to join in an on list TDCR/DCR/CR reading of *King Lear*? For one thing negativity seems a significant theme. For another I'd like to wonder about it at the level of depth realism, I mean, what are the real structures its about, etc. I'd be interested in the confrontation of DCR (and Volosinov) and aesthetics, etc. And all kind of other etcs. It's a different sort of project than reading a text like DPF and completely compatible with continuing work on DPF. It's a chance, in a small way, to wrestle with actually doing DCR etc among the interdisciplinarians.
?
Howard
--- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
--- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- BHA: DPF intro, (continued)
- BHA: DPF intro, Richard Moodey Tue 13 Feb 2001, 14:58 GMT
- BHA: another go at the DPF intro, Ruth Groff Fri 16 Feb 2001, 05:10 GMT
- Re: BHA: listers, learers and lurkers, lynne engelskirchen Fri 16 Feb 2001, 07:04 GMT
- BHA: Cyber-CR, Timothy A Dayton Fri 16 Feb 2001, 17:43 GMT
- Re: BHA: listers, learers and lurkers, Gary MacLennan Fri 16 Feb 2001, 20:51 GMT
- Re: BHA: listers, learers and lurkers, Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 16 Feb 2001, 22:19 GMT
- Re: BHA: another go at the DPF intro, maputto Fri 16 Feb 2001, 07:16 GMT
- Re: Comment of Sean's post was Re: BHA: Re: on Bhaskar's politics, Andrew Hagen Sun 11 Feb 2001, 22:43 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Comment of Sean's post was Re: BHA: Re: on Bhaskar's politics, Andrew Hagen Sun 11 Feb 2001, 22:50 GMT