Re: BHA: what's next

[Ruth Groff <rgroff@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Karl, all,

As I said, I don't mind at all if people want to discuss Archer, though I
won't be in a position to participate.

But I'm a little surprised, Karl, by your post.  I'm not clear why it would
be "unnerving," as you put it, that the Bhaskar list would be focused on
reading and discussing of Bhaskar's works.  I don't think that there is any
question that the list was founded for this purpose.  (See the list address,
the original project of reading of RTS, etc.)

Clearly things have begun to evolve, such that a good 50% of people stating
a preference would rather turn to Archer now.  But I do think that the
simple answer to your question is that, so far at least, this list has, in
fact, been the Bhaskar list.  (For what it's worth, I actually share some of
the concerns that you raise.  But I see them as logically unrelated to the
merits of having a venue for to the discussion of a single thinker.)

A little confused,
Ruth





     --- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---