>and field more comments. the we would sum up. what do you think?
Sounds good to me
> >l&a > >Gary > > >At 01:56 22/01/01 +0000, you wrote: >>A good idea, but before we contact Maggie we'd better decide which >>we're >>doing. We have two in favour of *Being Human* and two if favour of >>*DPF*. May be a compromise would be to do *Being Human* relatively >>quickly and then come back to *DPF*? In my view we need a >>chair/organiser (not me!)... >> >>Mervyn >> >>Gary MacLennan
- Re: BHA: Delivered up to the world, (continued)
- Re: BHA: Delivered up to the world, Erik Weissengruber Fri 26 Jan 2001, 19:22 GMT
- Re: BHA: Delivered up to the world, Gary MacLennan Fri 26 Jan 2001, 20:49 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Erik Weissengruber Mon 22 Jan 2001, 15:10 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: BHA: what's next, Ruth Groff Mon 22 Jan 2001, 15:17 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Erik Weissengruber Tue 23 Jan 2001, 03:41 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Ruth Groff Fri 26 Jan 2001, 21:33 GMT
- RE: BHA: what's next, Phil Walden Fri 26 Jan 2001, 22:25 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Ruth Groff Sun 28 Jan 2001, 03:01 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, karl.maton Sun 28 Jan 2001, 13:51 GMT