I would be willing to chair but first I must order the book. I would advocate setting a date to begin. we organise some contributors who would review/respond to the book then Margaret could come on and respond to these and field more comments. the we would sum up. what do you think?
l&a
Gary
A good idea, but before we contact Maggie we'd better decide which we're doing. We have two in favour of *Being Human* and two if favour of *DPF*. May be a compromise would be to do *Being Human* relatively quickly and then come back to *DPF*? In my view we need a chair/organiser (not me!)...
Mervyn
Gary MacLennan <g.maclennan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes >I will set about getting the book, Mervyn. But why not contact Margaret >herself and get her to come on the list for a brief specified period - say >5 days- to answer questions about it. we could begin our discussions with >her or build up to it. I raised the possibi9lity of such a seminar with >her at the conference and she was very agreeable to the idea. > >regards > >Gary
--- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
--- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Re: BHA: what's next, (continued)
- Re: BHA: what's next, Jan Straathof Sun 21 Jan 2001, 00:51 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Andrew Hagen Sun 21 Jan 2001, 03:09 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Gary MacLennan Sun 21 Jan 2001, 22:13 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Mervyn Hartwig Mon 22 Jan 2001, 14:47 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Gary MacLennan Mon 22 Jan 2001, 21:01 GMT
- Re: BHA: what's next, Mervyn Hartwig Wed 24 Jan 2001, 14:41 GMT
- Re: BHA: the litmus test, lynne engelskirchen Thu 25 Jan 2001, 08:17 GMT
- Re: BHA: the litmus test, Andrew Brown Thu 25 Jan 2001, 09:35 GMT
- Re: BHA: the litmus test, Tobin Nellhaus Fri 26 Jan 2001, 01:20 GMT