Re: BHA: what's next

[Ruth Groff <rgroff@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi guys,

Well, I'm pretty agreeable, and the Archer book sounds good, but I guess I'd
prefer to stick with RB's works still.  There seem to be a lot of very basic
and interesting interpretive disagreements just about PON, even, without
even venturing back into DPF.  But either would do for me -- or SRHE, for
that matter.  SRHE is fairly difficult, though not on the order of DPF, and
I know I would certainly love to have the benefit of a close, collective
reading.  Even if it were only of selected passages.

In any case, the very few of us who have responded seem to be about half and
half on the question.  Would others like to chime in?

Warmly,
Ruth



     --- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---