critical-realism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: BHA: Nixon's lies
- Subject: Re: BHA: Nixon's lies
- From: Ruth Groff <rgroff@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 11:51:50 -0400 (EDT)
Hi everybody,
No fair jumping on Louis when I was the one who brought up crazy old
Habermas! I was refering to his speech act stuff, which I believe he gets
from Austin (is this right?), the point of which, as I understand it, is
that truth-telling is the primary purpose of language; that other uses
depend on the "locutionary," or assertion-making aspect, and that, within
this mode, lying, to be effective, is logically dependent on the implicit
"This claim is true" carried by locutionary statements.
I don't know that this is a correct view to hold, but I'm pretty sure that
it, or something close to it, is Habermas'.
R.
--- from list bhaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: BHA: In defense of Habermasian Angelism, (continued)
- Re: BHA: Truth....,
Colin Wight Fri 22 May 1998, 17:03 GMT
- BHA: Correction -- sorry!,
Ruth Groff Fri 22 May 1998, 16:11 GMT
- BHA: Nixon's lies,
MSPRINKER Fri 22 May 1998, 15:27 GMT
- BHA: Alethia, Issue 2,
Mervyn Hartwig Mon 18 May 1998, 20:55 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]