Re: [AUT] Foucault and 'Whatever-singularity' so totally tops most annoying concept poll

["lemmett@xxxxxxxxxx" <lemmett@xxxxxxxxxx>]

What person are you talking about??

The good thing about philosophers [like Foucault] is that there are no implications and so he's beyond criticism. Or is that me I don't know? By which l I mean is that the only reason I mentioned Foucault was because I didn't understand him: obviously, short of telling me to butt out, you could explain something believable isn't just fool's gold? What even is the currency of those that aren't fascist or conservative??


--- On Tue, 13/10/09, claudius <claudius.laumanns@xxxxxx> wrote:

From: claudius <claudius.laumanns@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AUT] Foucault and 'Whatever-singularity' so totally tops most annoying concept poll
To: "Autonomia, Operaismo, and Class Composition" <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, 13 October, 2009, 7:47 PM

lemmett@xxxxxxxxxx schrieb:
> Like taking scientific neorealism seriously? I find that most everyone with a reputation has something interesting to say except people like I don't know conservatives writing about conservatism.
>

Come on. I was in a really silly mood. H+ is somewhere between science fiction and near future. I agree there are some (not all)  posts with conservative ore even fascist implications.
_______________________________________________
aut-op-sy mailing list
aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aut-op-sy
aut-op-sy

_______________________________________________
aut-op-sy mailing list
aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aut-op-sy
aut-op-sy