Nachie wrote:
I continue by mentioning what I believe to be the two major impotencies of current analysis; first, that it tends to center on the role of imperialist intervention as opposed to the gestating class upheaval that provokes it, and secondly that North American anarchists often have trouble in recognizing movements that take place outside of their own familiar dialogue.
I think that American anarchists (or Yankee anarchists if that's more specific) have been following the situation in Venezuela. The fact that another leftist is in power in some country isn't an excuse for us anarchists to soften our criticism of the Chavez government. There are enough signs already that the Chavez government is drifting towards being just another authoritarian government.
I support efforts by Venezuelans to move their lives in an anarchist direction. I see little reason to give the Chavez government a free pass just because he happens to be a leftist.
Chuck0 Infoshop.org
- Re: [AUT] Re: russian autonomists?, (continued)
- Re: [AUT] Re: russian autonomists?, Ois . Fri 17 Jun 2005, 15:27 GMT
- Re: [AUT] Re: russian autonomists?, d d Fri 17 Jun 2005, 20:58 GMT
- [AUT] Remember the Wolfowitz Vanity Fair Interview?, Nicholas J. Kiersey Wed 15 Jun 2005, 01:21 GMT
- [AUT] The nature of the Venezuela situation, Nachie Tue 14 Jun 2005, 02:00 GMT
- Re: [AUT] The nature of the Venezuela situation, Chuck0 Tue 14 Jun 2005, 02:10 GMT
- RE: [AUT] The nature of the Venezuela situation, casadepaup Sat 18 Jun 2005, 02:07 GMT
- [AUT] Fwd: [Reader-list] India has one of the world's best universities, martin hardie Mon 13 Jun 2005, 18:16 GMT
- [AUT] Great News PGA Conference, Robin Fairbridge Gaskell Sun 12 Jun 2005, 07:40 GMT
- [AUT] cwa strikes 1969, martin hardie Thu 09 Jun 2005, 11:28 GMT