Re: AUT: My New Signature: Portrait of a young artist as a leftist

["Harald Beyer-Arnesen" <haraldba@xxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Seay" <entheogens@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: AUT: My New Signature: Portrait of a young artist as a leftist


> Yes, my new email signature.  Hoping to pick a fight
> with the "In the beginning, there was No" crowd.
>
> -Thomas

Hardly, that would not be dialectical thought; more like
one of those dualisms deleuzians get ensnared within ;-)

On the other hand, "to affirm a difference" is unescapably
a negation, if words still have meaning.

Harald

> --- Martin Hardie <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > que bueno Thomas I presume this will be your email
> > signature- muy bien!
> >
> >
> > On Monday 29 Nov 2004 22:29, Thomas Seay wrote:
> > > =====
> > > <<Furthermore, we must ask what does the
> > dialectician want?
> > > What does this will which wills the dialectic
> > want?  It is an exhausted
> > > force which does not have the strength to affirm
> > its difference, a force
> > > which no longer acts but rather reacts to the
> > forces which dominate it-only
> > > such a force brings to the foreground the negative
> > element in its relation
> > > to the other.  Such a force denies all that it is
> > not and makes this
> > > negation its own essence and the principle of its
> > existence.>>  -Gilles
> > > Deleuze "Nietzche & Philosophy"
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >      --- from list
> > aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> >
> > --
> > ::::::::::::::::::
> > http://auskadi.tk
> > + 34 665757391
> > + 34 944668670
> > ::::::::::::::::::
> >
> >
> >      --- from list
> > aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> >
>
>
> =====
> <<Furthermore, we must ask what does the dialectician want?
> What does this will which wills the dialectic want?  It is an exhausted
> force which does not have the strength to affirm its difference, a force
which no longer acts but rather reacts to the forces which dominate it-only
such a force brings to the foreground the negative element in its relation
to the other.  Such a force denies all that
> it is not and makes this negation its own essence and the principle
> of its existence.>>  -Gilles Deleuze "Nietzche & Philosophy"
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
> http://my.yahoo.com
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---