Re: AUT: Negri and Charleton Heston?

["Harald Beyer-Arnesen" <haraldba@xxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lowe Laclau" <lowe.laclau@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: AUT: Negri and Charleton Heston?


<<I don't see why one would need to "negate" anything to
make use of constant capital... >>

Maybe in phantasy land, you don't have to. Sorry, Lowe, but
this is at the very best a self-delution.  And a good example
of how one can get oneself so lost within theory that one
ends up denying concrete reality. In this world we are livng
in there is no affirmation without negation (other than in a
few sacred moments.)
        (I know that it was critical to Deleuze throughout his
life to try to show this need not be so. But there is absolutely
*nothing* to point to that he succeeded, or could succeed
in this; however many the blind alleys travelled, and however
heroic the effort. Even the title, Anti-Oedipus bear
wittness to this. )

Harald

P.S In the period quoted above, I left out the last part: "...for
the multitude to be defined as "subject".



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---