Re: AUT: Negri and Charleton Heston?

[Lowe Laclau <lowe.laclau@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Since Negri scraps negation and dialectic, he can only be trapped in a
> dualism of "multitude as whole class' and 'multitude as subject'.

Where is the "trap"? Or rather what is the significance of this idea
of "multitude as a whole"? It is simply constant capital. There is no
trap there, it doesn't end with what it accomplished at some point in
the past, with dead labor. I don't see why one would need to "negate"
anything to make use of constant capital... for the multitude to be
defined as "subject".


     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---