aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Re: Henwood and Lenin
- Subject: Re: AUT: Re: Henwood and Lenin
- From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:06:04 -0400
Harry M. Cleaver wrote:
>Forgetting the Leninist people, it would be nice to have a version of your
>paper focused on the first part: how the world no longer works exactly the
>way Lenin thought it did. I'd like to have it for my students. I might
>just use, or excerpt, what you have already written.
That would be an interesting exercise but I'm not sure what purpose
it would serve, other than a purely scholastic one. I still don't
know what it means to be a Leninist in an OECD country in the 21st
century, and I don't see what relevance his writings have to
contemporary politics. With Marx, there's something fresh and
relevant on almost every page; Lenin's stuff reads like a series of
pamphlets, written for particular moments that have long passed.
Doug
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- AUT: What Negri loses,
Kurasje Archive Fri 29 Oct 2004, 21:36 GMT
- AUT: Notes on Dialectics,
Chris Hurl Fri 29 Oct 2004, 19:46 GMT
- AUT: ESF and What is to be Done,
John Holloway Fri 29 Oct 2004, 15:29 GMT
- AUT: Re: Henwood and Lenin,
Harry M. Cleaver Fri 29 Oct 2004, 11:58 GMT
- Re: what is to be done with what is to be done? was Re: AUT:RE:Virno,
Steve Wright Fri 29 Oct 2004, 10:47 GMT
- Re: what is to be done with what is to be done? was Re: AUT:,
Tahir Wood Fri 29 Oct 2004, 08:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]