aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?
- Subject: Re: AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?
- From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:32:14 -0400
.: s0metim3s :. wrote:
>Did I send this already?
>
>http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0102/msg00083.html
Thanks for the reminder - I'd forgotten that.
This, of course, is my favorite part:
>And then, of course, Doug Henwood, the extremely intelligent
>and fantastically entertaining American Marxist finance journalist finished
>off the conference in great party-thrashing style (I recall a similar
>performance at the Geert Lovink-initiated conference in Amsterdam, where
>many of us met last year).
But this is pretty interesting:
>The conference was a disaster mostly because of Zizek's two hand-picked
>sidekicks. One Sebastian Burgen (or something), your perfect cold-as-ice
>Marxist sectarian psychopath politruk only too trigger-happy as the head of
>the conference . A self-acclaimed British Leninist-Trotskyist, "Sebastian"
>might just as well have been your average Mormon or Jehovah's Witness. The
>kind of guy who goes to Pyongyang to satisfy his sadist (or masochist) taste
>for oriental pussy and has few if any friends anywhere else. And a living
>example of why we do NOT want to return to any "dictatorship" of the
>proletariat. "Sebastian" would have had every Foucauldian and Deleuzian in
>the world killed his first minute in office...
>"Sebastian" had consequently completely misunderstood Zizek's ambition (as
>if he was ever capable of understanding Zizek, his world was just "Zizek is
>OK cause he likes my Hero-God Lenin and has resources and fame") and
>therefore filled half the schedule with mainly defunct and asocial
>Trotskyists who had nothing but their classic, tiresome rubble to perform.
>And then "Sebastian" made sure dialogue at the conference was reduced to an
>absolute minimum.
Really makes you want to run out & buy the book, doesn't it?
Doug
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: what is to be done with what is to be done? was Re: AUT:,
Tahir Wood Fri 29 Oct 2004, 08:05 GMT
- AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?,
.: s0metim3s :. Fri 29 Oct 2004, 07:19 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?,
Doug Henwood Fri 29 Oct 2004, 13:32 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?,
Harald Beyer-Arnesen Fri 29 Oct 2004, 13:47 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?,
Tahir Wood Fri 29 Oct 2004, 14:06 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?,
Nate Holdren Fri 29 Oct 2004, 14:29 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?,
Carlos Timonero Fri 29 Oct 2004, 20:15 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]