aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: The Slavoj Note
- Subject: Re: AUT: The Slavoj Note
- From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:20:46 -0400
Thomas Seay wrote:
>--- Sebastian Budgen <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
><<From: slavoj zizek <szizek@xxxxxxxxx>>>
>
>Great! Does anybody know if he's on Yahoo
>messenger...I want to IM him! I just added him as a
>Yahoo friend!!!
>
>> > I did NOT say what he claims!!!!
>> >
>> > All the best, Slavoj
>
>Well after the "'Empire' IS/IS NOT the new Communist
>Manifesto" fiasco, who the hell is going to bet on
>this? Tomorrow he might say that he "did say what he
>[Doug Henwood] claims". Is this confusion over
>affirmation/negation a hegelian thing?
He did say it. Why would I make it up?
Doug
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: RE: what is to be done with what is to be done?, (continued)
- RE: what is to be done with what is to be done? was Re: AUT: RE:Virno piece,
.: s0metim3s :. Thu 28 Oct 2004, 20:30 GMT
- AUT: Re: The Slavoj Note,
Eubulides Thu 28 Oct 2004, 19:25 GMT
- AUT: The Slavoj Note,
Thomas Seay Thu 28 Oct 2004, 19:12 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: what is to be done with what is to be done? Survival,
Peter van Heusden Thu 28 Oct 2004, 18:07 GMT
- AUT: Fwd: Re:,
Sebastian Budgen Thu 28 Oct 2004, 17:56 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]