aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: what is to be done with what is to be done? was Re: AUT: RE:
- Subject: Re: what is to be done with what is to be done? was Re: AUT: RE:
- From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:47:22 -0400
Sebastian Budgen wrote:
>>And who organizes a conference these days where 94% of the
>>presenters are male, anyway? That would have been a good place to
>>apply some fresh thinking to some old problems.
>
>Now, that's what I call a real argument, Doug. So rigorous, so
>cutting, so not-at-all-demagogic! You're doing yourself really proud!
Wow, I'm pretty stunned that you seem to think this is a trivial
critique. What century are you living in?
I was really entertained by the woman who read Badiou's paper for him
because he was allegedly too busy to come. She introduced it by
saying that back in the 19th century, rich people could buy their way
out of the military draft. She added, "And Badiou is a rich man."
Doug
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]