aut-op-sy
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

RE: AUT: RE: Fwd: [FSE-ESF] The Truth about Sunday



Thaigo,

What are you talking about?  Or, should I say: I'm
not sure you're responding to what I wrote, and
what it was a specific response to.   As far as I
can tell, neither of us has a sense of what
happened in those particular events and how it led
to that point.  I haven't commented on that.

I am, however, pretty sure that when Callinicos
writes garbage like this:

> violence doesn't
> belong within our movement, and neither do those
who bring it into the
> movement.

what he means is they want to monopolise the use
of violence within movements.  This is what
'stewards' do.  They can cry foul, but they're
hypocrites.

Angela



: On 20/10/2004 2:19 PM, ".: s0metim3s
: :." <s0metim3s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
: > Sebastian,
: >
: > I'm surprised you even bothered to
: send this piece
: > of filth around.
: >
: > : This involved attacking the
: > : stewards - mainly women and young
: > : > people, many of them people of colour.
: >
: > But I've a question, which is I admit quite
: > loaded, but with a view to making
: something that
: > Callinicos tried to hide with his chivalrous
: > indignation: Do you think that it's
: the personnel
: > of the state or the form that's at issue?
: >
: > Angela
: > _______________
:
: Come on, now, it's Alex Callinicos!
: He's very wise. Remember last year when
: he told us all about the dangers of
: 'economism' - ie. of concerning
: ourselves with anything except the SWP
: project of 'anti-imperialism'. What's
: that? "Fat lot of good that did" I hear
: you say. Oh, don't be so harsh.
: Think of the millions of...flyers!
:
: Still, I can't quite see what the point
: of bashing the marshalls up is. God
: knows I have wanted to thwack the
: proto-state. Generally, however, that
: accomplishes very little except
: justifying the statists' preconceptions, as
: well as convincing a good many others
: of the wisdom of repressing lunatic
: anarchists. I'd like to know how it
: doesn't. Who exactly sits there, watches
: a bunch of kids get bashed by hooded
: dudes, in the middle of an anti-fascism
: plenary, no matter how contrived,  and
: draws the inference - "AHA! Here is
: the state-in-waiting copping one!"  Or
: maybe the point is that no one does,
: and we shouldn't appeal to anyone,
: because if we did, boy, wouldn't we just
: have made fools of ourselves - the
: impression might even be given that there
: is a 'we'!
:
: I can understand the rage, I can't
: understand the stupidity, actually, the
: cowardice that finds a meeting of
: half-hearted anti-fascists  bust into
: because 'it resembles a state', whilst
: outside, a fully realised, more than
: half-fascist state stands. While I hate
: calls for unity,  popular fronts and
: spectacles of oppositionism like th ESF
: or WSF as much as you do, I cannot
: see why I should like spectacles of
: opposition of any other variety either.
: This 'anarchist' action is incribed in
: a spectacle no less phoney and
: neutralizing than Grandpa Callinico's,
: only smaller in size.
:
: Thiago
:
:
:
:
:
:
:      --- from list
: aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
:




     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]