Re: AUT: antiwar movement

["Nate Holdren" <nateholdren@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

It's more like Kripkenstein, really, as I seem to remember it being a highly
controversial presentation. Someone should write a book about Negri's
immeasurable value, incommunicability, and Tarski's semantic definition of
truth. It'd be sufficiently unreadable to make for a potential academic
bestseller, and admit sufficiently broad enough interpretations to provide
readers with resources for their political aims whatever they may be.


>From: "Eubulides" <paraconsistent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: AUT: antiwar movement
>Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:39:30 -0800
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Thiago Oppermann" <thiago_oppermann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Somewhere, Saul Kripke argued on Wittgensteinian grounds that the nature
>of
>language was such as to make planning of meaning impossible ...therefore
>no
>planned economy was possible. That was a hoot.
>
>Thiago
>
>
>=================
>
>"it has struck me that there is perhaps a certain analogy between
>Wittgenstein's private language argument and Ludwig von Mises's celebrated
>argument concerning economic calculation under socialism...now almost
>universally rejected as a theoretical propostion" [ SK: "Wittgenstein on
>Rules and Private Language" 1982]
>
>
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

_________________________________________________________________
Get reliable access on MSN 9 Dial-up. 3 months for the price of 1!
(Limited-time offer)
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup&pgmarket=en-us&ST=1/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---