aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement
- Subject: Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement
- From: "Peter Jovanovic" <peterzoran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:10:27 +1100
hi all
In regards to the whole "antiwar movement is not progressive" stuff i'm
certainly in favour of action against the war outside of the usual leftist
rackets but Dave I hardly think you'll get the antiwar rightwingers at
antiwar.com to sign on to your revolutionary agenda. or are you just after a
bourgeois democratic revolution (hence the possibility of "libertarians" as
allies) about two centuries too late rather than a communist revolution?
cheers
pete
_________________________________________________________________
You could be a genius! Find out by taking the IQ Test 2003. $5.50 (incl
GST). Click here: http://sites.ninemsn.com.au/minisite/testaustralia/
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement, (continued)
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
Newdem Mon 22 Mar 2004, 21:01 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
Lowe Laclau Mon 22 Mar 2004, 21:01 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
Tom Messmer Mon 22 Mar 2004, 22:11 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
cerclesocial Mon 22 Mar 2004, 22:18 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
Peter Jovanovic Tue 23 Mar 2004, 00:10 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
Thomas Seay Tue 23 Mar 2004, 00:46 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
Thiago Oppermann Tue 23 Mar 2004, 01:00 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
Thomas Seay Tue 23 Mar 2004, 01:26 GMT
- Re: AUT: RE: antiwar movement,
Thiago Oppermann Tue 23 Mar 2004, 03:26 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]