Re: AUT: Query: Bordiga calling "Capital" a description of

[Nick Thoburn <nick.thoburn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It's a little enigmatic, but Dauve makes this point in _The Eclipse and
Re-Emergence of the Communist Movement_:

"In 1960 [Bordiga] said that the whole of Marx's work was a description of
communism. This is undoubtedly the most profound comment made about Marx."

(p. 83 in the Antagonism edition -
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/3909/epanne.html)

Nick


on 15/3/04 2:11 pm, Michael Handelman at mhandelman1@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I remember reading somewhere on the net, that Bordiga
> (or possibly the neo-bordigists, e.g. Camatte, Dauve)
> said that "Capital" is in fact a description of
> communism, in the sense, that communism will not have
> the features that Marx describes about capitalism
> (i.e. communism will not have commodity production,
> wage-labor, exchange-values etc)
>
>
> Does anyone know where I could locate this reference?
> I thought it was in Loren Goldner's article on
> Bordiga, but I can't seem to find it in his article.
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---