aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
AUT: Foucault on power and domination
- Subject: AUT: Foucault on power and domination
- From: "David McInerney" <borderlands@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:23:49 +1030
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter van Heusden" <pvh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: AUT: Rate of exploitation and the labor process
---snip---
> P.S. I also think that the Weberian definiton of domination is rather
> outmoded for our (?) post-modern world, in that it talks about domination
> as experienced as an external force upon the subject. Why not use a more
> Foucaultian model? Or a Deleuzeguattarian one?
> --
> Peter van Heusden pvh@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tel: +27 (0)83 256 0457
I have to agree with this, although many - perhaps inspired by Critical
Theory - still find value in the Weberian concept. For those who are
interested in the usage of Deleuze and Foucault, Paul Patton has written a
very good paper discussing domination and power in Foucault, and we can
access it free via Spoons at the following link:
http://lists.village.virginia.edu/listservs/spoons/foucault.archive/papers/p
atton
It was published in Jeremy Moss (ed), _The Later Foucault_ (1998).
David
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]