AUT: ANSWER and the liberals

[neil <74742.1651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, when I used the abbreviation  "pol"
it meant -political! Horror of horrors to some
here . This means then 'politicos' - , which then
is discovered a "party' which then those means
a-priori 'vanguardism' which then means
copy catter 'bolshevism'  which  then = stalinism or
something close to new state capping operations.,
Gee, Herald  its real simple isn't it??

I am for Revolutionary Political Orgs coming into
being out of struggle-- not to take power over the
class via State monopoly- state capitalism -but
to being tribunes  in the coming working class
councils-assemblies  froms of the future -- more along the
lines of the political  Gorter-Pannekoek  forces
that fought for the  KAPD  type party idea-- the Dutch
and German left although
this has to be brought up to date to cope in the
globalized capital and the true world class  of today.
. But the questions remain today of how to build for that future period,
so the proletarait has a chance to engage capital as a class
for itself with power, & not only in itself.


On the serious side, and past what is really
pol- as in political -smokescreens.
Instead of making a big sphatzir   about   2 words,
we should be dealing with actual class battles
and actions against capitals solutions that
are costing workers livelihoods,  bodies and lives
worldwide.
Communists that want to be useful to their class
have to carry out serious pol- as in political work ,
with the class -social forces in motion and strenghten
the class strggle trends  alive in the struggles.
All else is smokescreens and avoidance of
real dialogue-progress in joining activity between  rev-
as in revolutionary-
trends.

I am glad there are some others here into looking at these
questions anew , and  with critical-open  approaches no less. That
is a step forward.

The issues can still be addressed
in the US movements  of dealing effectively with -
!) the dominance of the rulers left wing , its lib-lab politics  over
the anti war forces in motion .
2) the coming 'support our troops' style
chauvinist campaign by the bosses  servants /media
on the eve of actual invasion and occupation.
3) showing the capitalist roots of militarism and war
and effect on the 'home front'
4) How can masses build new fighting organizations
aganst all  the old impediments-
5) Showing that communist workers ruled society  is not
state capitalism .

Neil



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---